Not long ago, we knew about the mind-blowing discovery of ‘Oumuamua, the very first interstellar to enter the solar system. We wonder what would it feel like to discover that?
This phenomenal finding served as an aid for astronomers to think about the developments of solar systems past our own, however, it additionally helps in their research about the presence of an alien probe.
The asteroid made them engage to a possibility that life on our planet might not have begun from Earth itself – a common hypothesis, however, has greater validity on account of ‘Oumuamua.
The most famous theory about the start of life on Earth is through abiogenesis.
It is a natural and precise procedure in which certain conditions made life exist out of non-living things, for example, simple organic compounds
On the other hand, panspermia is the theory that says life on Earth started from the existence of living cells and microorganisms that were moved to our planet from somewhere in space.
Maybe it was carried by an object like ‘Oumuamua a hundred billion years ago.
NPR portrays it like plant seeds being wind up to different areas where they flourish and develop in the long run.
In any case, if life did begin elsewhere and arrived here on Earth, this makes one wonder where did it come from? Also, how precisely did life start, if not through abiogenesis?
‘Oumuamua opens up such a large number of interesting research, particularly with regards to the possibility of life existing in other places in the universe.
Which hypothesis do you think is more possible and credible with regards to the origin of life? And what would it look like at the beginning of everything?